|
With the possible exception of the Freelander,
never has a Land Rover looked less like a Land Rover. Yet, arguably,
the 101 Forward Control may be the most able vehicle to have ushered
forth from Lode Lane. No-one can deny that the 101 is ugly - yet
therein lies its beauty. Its body is bereft of a single curve -
but what straight lines!
The roots of the 101 go as far back as 1966. At
this time the Army were beginning to replace their 105mm Pack Howitzer
field guns with the all-new 105mm Light Gun, which was eventually
accepted into service in 1973. During the intervening period it
became clear that the 109 GS was not going to be up to the job of
towing this new gun as it was going to be 750lbs / 340Kg heavier
that its predecessor.
Fortunately for Land Rover, this was a period when the military
were as keen to buy Land Rovers as Land Rover were to sell to the
military. As a result, the two sides formed what was, to all intents
and purposes, a design committee made up from Land Rover's engineering
department and MVEE (the Military Vehicle Engineering Establishment).
In 1966 this committee laid down the parameters for the Army's new
Gun Tractor and Land Rover undertook to build prototypes. The initial
requirement was for a vehicle capable of towing a 4,000lb artillery
weapon (the production 105mm Field Gun actually came in at 4,088lbs
/ 1,858kg) at speed over rough terrain. The vehicle should also
be capable of carrying the six-man gun crew and their equipment,
plus driver and passenger. It should be small enough to fit into
the RAF's Andover transport aircraft and be light enough for sling-transportation
by the latest generation of heavy-lift helicopters.
Nothing in the Land Rover family album could not come anywhere
close to matching such requirements, so Norman Busby was appointed
Project Engineer and started work in mid-1966 with a blank sheet
of paper. In order to achieve the required compactness, a forward
control design was settled upon with the driving compartment over
the engine. The wheelbase was kept as short as possible, as were
the front and rear overhangs - the "brick with a wheel at each
corner" design came early. The classic Land Rover-style box-section
ladder frame chassis was used, but with straight side members rather
than the usual arched curves to accommodate the axles.
The power train was more problematical, as it was clear that this
vehicle was going to need all the power and torque it could get.
The most powerful engine then available to Land Rover was the 3-litre
straight six, detuned from its original saloon car application to
give 110bhp at 4,500rpm and 150lb ft at 1,500rpm. This was fed through
a near-normal Land Rover four speed box and two-speed transfer box.
The then-experimental Lightweight provided the inspiration for the
demountable body panel design, even though weight reduction was
not the over-riding concern for the Gun Tractor. It was, though,
seen to make it more readily adaptable. The first prototype was
built up during late 1966 and early 1967, with the first testing
prototypes being delivered to the MVEE in the summer. During this
period the Army were also looking at alternative vehicles for this
role, amongst them the Steyr-Puch Haflinger (the forerunner to the
remarkable Pinzgauer that is now in service) and the Volvo 4140.
The early testing of the prototypes raised a number of issues and
a number of changes were made. The most important of these was to
the power train as the MVEE reported that the vehicle was under-powered
with the straight-six engine. Time was, on this occasion, on Land
Rover's side as the ex-Buick 3.5 V8 had by now entered production
for Rover saloons in 1967 and was already being considered for use
in the Land Rover 100-inch Station Wagon (which later became the
Range Rover). Better still, this planned application was also developing
a new gearbox and transfer box to go with it, so the Gun Tractor
team decided to try this new combination out as well. By December
1968 one of the prototypes had been fitted with the new V8 and gearbox.
With this new set-up came permanent four-wheel drive, which put
less strain on the rear axle and therefore allowed the heavy-duty
ENV rear axle to be replaced by a lightweight Salisbury unit. The
first installations used the transmission in standard Range Rover
form, which resulted in very steep propshaft angles and a similarly
steep number of propshaft failures. Shortening of the bellhousing
and the first motion shaft allowed the gearbox to be moved further
forward and thereby reducing the angles on the rear propshaft. After
further general modifications resulting from hot-weather testing
in California, the MVEE declared themselves to be satisfied with
the 101.
Even so, the 101's development was by no means complete. The 105mm
Field Gun was not due in service until 1975, and so had no need
for the new purpose-built vehicle until 1974 at the earliest. The
intervening period was taken up with experiments with powered trailer
drives and adapting the 101 to meet whatever additional role requirements
the military came up with. This constant movement of goalposts became
particularly irksome for Land Rover, particularly when the Army's
delivery requirements are taken into consideration. As the 101 is
so different to any other Land Rover, the only way it could be built
with any sort of efficiency was to build in large batches on the
existing Lode Lane assembly lines. However, the Army wanted to take
the 101 in small batches to match deliveries of the 105mm Field
Gun. After a great deal of discussion, it appears that Land Rover
issued an ultimatum - the Army would take delivery in large batches
or not at all. A compromise was reached whereby a handful of vehicles
were produced between 1972 and 1974 and the majority were built
in large batches between 1975 and 1977, the most intensive year
being 1976.
|
Type
/ Year |
1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
1975 |
1976 |
1977 |
1978 |
Total |
|
RHD Home |
10 |
6 |
8 |
532 |
337 |
426 |
3 |
1332 |
|
RHD Export |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
22 |
- |
28 |
|
LHD Export |
2 |
- |
- |
76 |
304 |
201 |
- |
583 |
|
RHD 24v |
9 |
3 |
- |
70 |
86 |
2 |
- |
170 |
|
LHD 24v |
6 |
1 |
- |
160 |
160 |
111 |
27 |
465 |
|
LHD 24v
Export |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
64 |
28 |
92 |
|
Total |
27 |
10 |
8 |
838 |
893 |
826 |
58 |
2660 |
Active Service
The first operational deployment of the 101 came in 1982 as part
of the Falklands Task Force. Although it was generally accepted
that the islands were unsuitable for wheeled vehicles, a few were
taken by the Paras and Commandos - one was even captured on film
during the liberation of Port Stanley. Their next large-scale deployment
was to Saudi Arabia in 1990-91 where, in their Rapier Missile System
Tractor role, they provided the last line of defence for the British
troop concentrations preparing to recapture Kuwait. Soon after,
a small contingent served with the Royal Marines in Northern Iraq
tasked with protecting the Kurds. A small number even made it out
to Croatia and Bosnia in the first half of the Nineties, but by
the end of 1998 almost all had been withdrawn from service. The
last big batch to be released were the ambulance-bodied vehicles;
these retired en-masse in 1999.
After twenty-five years in service, it is not unreasonable
to expect the 101s to retire gracefully. However, they nearly had
a second life when Land Rover offered to refurbish the entire fleet
and replace the V8 engines with the now mainstream 2.5Tdi and a
redesigned cab for a fraction of the price of new vehicles. The
MoD declined this offer and so the only taxpayers to benefit from
this decision were those who bought themselves what many consider
to be the best small military 4x4xfar.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acknowledgements
Original authors:
James Taylor, Land Rover Owner August 1994
Bob Morrison, Land Rover Monthly June 2000
Compiled and re-written by Mike Allmey, with thanks
to James Taylor for allowing his research and writing to be borrowed
in this fashion.
|